Kate vs. Meghan: Princesses at War? The Facts Part 2


The UK press does not make up stories as stated in the TLC Kate v. Meghan: Princesses at War  let’s investigate with facts:

The Mirror

Published an article on 12 June 2018 entitled “Meghan Markles steamy photos used as evidence in court case over Kate Middleton topless picture.

Duchess Meghan’s lawyers held The Mirror accountable. Knowing that the facts and the law were not on their side, The Mirror admitted that  no provocative images of Meghan Markle were used in the proceeding of the Duchess Kate’s topless photographs. The Mirror apologized.

The Sun

The Sun buckled under the weight of truth and created a diplomatic incident with their imprudent headline: “MEG MOZZIE FEAR Prince Harry goes solo as pregnant Meghan axes Zambia trip over Zika virus concerns” on November 24, 2018.

This headline prompted a stern rebuke from the Zambian High Commission in the UK:

The Zambian government then launched a complaint with UK High commission; much to the chagrin of the UK government.

The fake news went viral across Africa and Asia; because of its potential to ruin Zambia’s tourism industry.

The Zambia High Commission Press Office also wrote to The Sun directly requesting a retraction and an apology:

The Zambia High Commission Press Office has since written to the SUN expressing displeasure and demanding a retraction of the story as well as an apology.  The mission has further advised the author to research as it is a known fact that Zambia has never experienced any Zika case and has not been listed on the Center for Disease Control and Prevention as a country that is prone to the disease.

When confronted by the IPSO or the law, these publications usually admit the error of their ways.

TLC damage to Royal Brand

What TLC succeeded in doing was to alienate Commonwealth Nations and global audiences; and undermined the credibility of the British royals. The British Royal Family is a global brand, but Commonwealth voices were excluded in TLC’s programme. The Commonwealth is mostly comprised of people of colour (POC); therefore, their exclusion from this special sent a message that reverberated throughout many Commonwealth Nations that the voices of POC are not important.

It is the leaders of the Commonwealth who determine amongst themselves the person who will become their “symbol of the free association of independent member nations” and thus, the Head of their organization. In the past, they have bestowed that honour to King George VI and Queen Elizabeth II. At the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM) in London 2018 it was formally announced that Prince Charles will succeed his mother as Head of the Commonwealth.

“We recognise the role of the Queen in championing the Commonwealth and its peoples. The next head of the Commonwealth shall be his Royal Highness Prince Charles, the Prince of Wales. His Royal Highness has been a proud supporter of the Commonwealth for more than four decades and has spoken passionately about the organisation’s unique diversity. And it is fitting that, one day, he will continue the work of his mother, Her Majesty the Queen.”(CHOGM, April 2018)

If Prince William aspires to succeed his father as the Head of the Commonwealth, Kensington Palace will have to do damage control. In TLC’s programme Katie Nicholl branded William (a future King) as intolerant, disrespectful and petty. Nicholl’s negative portrayal of Prince William’s character to global viewers ensures that he will have to work earnestly to change this perception of himself.


Post navigation